Artificial Sweeteners – A Free Lunch, or an Obesogenic Carcinogen? What 80+ Studies Say (part 1 of 2).
By: Date: Categories: Медицина


Is that guilt-free sweetness you are adding? Or POISON?

Many awesome experiences come tethered to inevitable baggage. Take binge drinking, for instance, or eating a dozen chocolate donuts in one sitting. An overflow of dopamine and hedonistic bliss in the moment, but a fiercely unpleasant stomach ache or hangover, along with a strong feeling of self disgust, awaits the next day. But in the case of artificial sweeteners, sugar substitutes that tickle our taste buds without the massive caloric load that is inherent of “real” sugar, we can have our stevia-sweetened cake and eat it too. Or can we?

On the surface, artificial sweeteners seem too good to be true. Let’s consider the most popular artificially sweetened product – diet soda. Though diet soda has an eerily similar taste to regular soda, the full sugar version contains with an extra 140 calories and 40 grams of sugar per 12oz serving, packing a serious, metabolically damaging punch. Artificial sweeteners deliver a sweet taste sans the calories and sugar but have been very much demonized in the media as a cause of all maladies, from obesity and metabolic syndrome to cancer. As we know, there is no such thing as a free lunch in biology; so, what’s the catch? Are artificial sweeteners the exception to the rule, or are they secretly making us sick and overweight? Let’s find out.

The story of artificial sweeteners begins in 1878 after German researcher Constantin Fahlberg “accidentally” stumbled upon the sweet taste after licking his finger while working in his lab. He went on to break the first rule in every science class and decided to lick every beaker and vial in his lab in a radical yet effective attempt to discover the source. After this severe compromise of hygiene and lab safety, he identified the sweet substance chemicals and would later produce the first commercially available artificial sweetener, saccharin (1).

Today, the artificial sweetener industry has BOOMED and calorie free sweeteners can be found in nearly every food product imaginable. Sugar-free versions of any sweet fare you can imagine, including barbecue sauce, syrup, and even powdered sugar itself, are readily available on the local supermarket shelf.

As Fahlberg discovered and others would go on to study, artificial sweeteners have a taste practically indistinguishable from sugar because, on a chemical level, the two share a similar molecule shape. The most common artificial sweeteners fall into three categories:

  1. Non-nutritive natural sweeteners, such as stevia or monk fruit.
  2. Non-nutritive artificial sweeteners, such as saccharin, aspartame, ace K, sucralose, etc.
  3. Sugar alcohols, such as erythritol, xylitol, etc. (anything that ends in “-ol”).

Despite their molecular similarities, they are processed completely differently than sugar in the body – while most artificial sweeteners are calorie-free and pass through the digestive tract without providing energy, the calories in “real” sugar are converted to fuel or stored for later use as body fat, or as glycogen in muscles and the liver.

Until recently, most accepted that it was just this simple; artificial sweeteners offer the same sweet taste as sugar without any of the consequences. That was, of course, until studies began to show otherwise. The primary headline about artificial sweeteners was not “Magic substance that will help you lose fat and stave off disease – more scientists need to start licking their lab equipment“, but more along the lines of “Artificial sweeteners cause cancer” and “Artificial sweeteners make you eat more and gain weight“. The 4 most common and alarming accusations against artificial sweeteners include:

  1. Artificial sweeteners cause weight gain
  2. Artificial sweeteners cause diabetes
  3. Artificial sweeteners disrupt gut bacteria
  4. Artificial sweeteners cause cancer

These potential side effects sound terrifying, and, if the accusations are true, no self-respecting health nut would be caught dead consuming such a substance. If you have already tossed all of your Splenda in the trash, I wouldn’t blame you. But before you take the can out to the curb and fully swear off on artificial sweeteners, let’s assess each accusation and see if it holds up under the scrutiny of the available body of research.

Artificial sweeteners cause weight gain

If you were to google “artificial sweeteners and obesity”, you would find a ton of websites, news articles, and even research studies that claim artificial sweeteners cause weight gain. As we know, Dr. Google is not a reliable source. This myth has only spread so far and wide because of two factors; misinterpretation of the research and sensationalism in the media. It is a slippery slope:

  1. A researcher finds reports an observational link between obesity and artificial sweeteners.
  2. Then, a journalist misinterprets that claim to believe that artificial sweeteners cause obesity.
  3. Finally, to make matters even more confusing, the mainstream media not only misinterprets but sensationalizes the aforementioned studies, with headlines such as “Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Weight Gain and Type 2 Diabetes” and “Your Artificial Sweetener May Be Giving You a Gut” (2, 3).

As you will see, just because headlines on your 5 o’clock news turn a lot of heads does not mean that they are well-substantiated.

The body of research on artificial sweeteners is a mixed bag. Many observational studies, including the first ones to pop up after a quick Google search, link artificial sweeteners to weight gain and unfavorable health outcomes (4, 5, 6, 7, 8). While mis-interpretation of observational studies casts artificial sweeteners in an unfavorable light, to date, there are ZERO well controlled, experimental studies that show a causal link between artificial sweeteners and weight gain. These studies may have some eye popping, clickbait titles, but NOT ONE shows causation in either direction.

Extrapolating from observational studies that “artificial sweeteners cause weight gain” is likened to claiming that ice cream consumption causes murder – just because both ice cream sales and murders increase in the summer does not mean downing a pint of moose tracks will make you kill your neighbor.

The majority of studies, on the other hand, link artificial sweeteners to no change in weight (9, 10, 11, 12) or to weight loss (13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). In many cases, the consumption of artificial sweeteners reduces overall sugar and calorie intakes, making it easier to lose or maintain weight. This calorie-reducing effect of artificial sweeteners holds up in well designed studies and it appears that artificial sweetener intake is an effective weight loss strategy for many people. For instance, this 2006 meta-analysis that only considered randomized controlled trials that assessed energy intake for at least 24 hours found that artificial sweetener consumption (specifically aspartame) resulted in a daily average calorie intake reduction of 10% (23). And this 2012 experimental study found that when replacing regular soda in the diet, diet soda had the same weight-loss inducing effects as water (24).

Furthermore, the researchers behind this study had overweight and obese people consume either a quarter gallon of water, milk, regular soda, or diet soda every day for 6 months. By the end of the study, those in the diet soda group weighed 17–21% less, had 24–31% less belly fat, 32% lower cholesterol levels, and 10–15% lower blood pressure, compared with those in the regular soda group (25).

As you can see, the observational links between artificial sweetener intake and weight gain that the media loves to promote can largely be explained by mistaking correlation for causation and the failure to recognize reverse causality. In other words, people who are gaining weight or already heavy may be consuming artificial sweeteners in an effort to reduce calorie consumption. Now that we have explained the faulty link between artificial sweeteners and weight gain or loss, let’s dive a little deeper into the actual mechanisms that may cause artificial sweeteners to impact weight.

To simplify matters, let’s break down the accusation that “artificial sweeteners cause weight gain” into 2 sub-sections:

Artificial sweeteners inherently cause weight gain on a physiological level.

In accordance with the laws of thermodynamics, a food that has zero calories cannot possibly cause weight gain. If a person consumed only artificial sweeteners and water, he/she would eventually starve to death. Unless they are a substance created by black magic or witchcraft and are able bypass the laws that govern the universe, artificial sweeteners don’t directly cause weight gain in any capacity.

Artificial sweeteners cause weight gain through downstream effects, such as by increasing appetite or by decreasing our sensitivity to sweetness and making us crave sugary foods.

This argument is much more interesting and requires that we delve into the research. Because artificial sweeteners taste sweet but do not contain calories, it has been postulated that they “trick” the brain into seeking out high-sugar, calorically dense foods in order to compensate for the lack of energy provided by the sweeteners (26).

It has been demonstrated in multiple studies – some in humans, some in rats – that consumption of artificial sweeteners can increase feeling of hunger (27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). For instance, this study showed that after exercise, those that drank either a sugar sweetened beverage or an artificially sweetened beverage consumed more calories at their next meal than those that drank water (33). And this study in rats showed that those that were given artificially sweetened beverages ate more calories compared to a group given sugar sweetened beverages. The authors explain that a possible mechanism may be that consumption of noncaloric sweet beverages either increases food intake or decreases energy expenditure (34).

It makes sense – if you ever want to get hungry quickly (i.e. before a Thanksgiving dinner or going out for ice cream), just consume a sweet such as candy or soda. The hyper-palatability of these foods tend to have an appetite inducing effect, and I suspect that this is the cause for the subsequent increased caloric consumption observed after artificial sweetener intake.

However, multiple studies support that consumption of artificial sweeteners either decrease or have no effect on subsequent energy intake or feelings of hunger (35). This study showed that artificial sweetener consumption did not impact subsequent energy intake or feelings of hunger and this review found that aspartame consumption is not associated with increased food intake (36, 37). Additionally, this 2020 study suggests that consumption of a stevia sweetened beverage, compared to water, before a meal may reduce appetite and energy intake, without affecting blood sugar or other metabolic markers (38).

One of the best explanations of artificial sweetener’s effect on food intake is the following excerpt from researcher Qing Yang:

Lastly, artificial sweeteners, precisely because they are sweet, encourage sugar craving and sugar dependence. Repeated exposure trains flavor preference. A strong correlation exists between a person’s customary intake of a flavor and his preferred intensity for that flavor. Systematic reduction of dietary salt or fat without any flavorful substitution over the course of several weeks led to a preference for lower levels of those nutrients in the research subjects. In light of these findings, a similar approach might be used to reduce sugar intake. Unsweetening the world’s diet may be the key to reversing the obesity epidemic (39).

Because repeated exposure does train flavor preference, it certainly follows that consumption of artificial sweeteners could lead to increased sugar consumption (40). This may result in increased consumption of calorically dense foods and lead to excess energy intake.

In short, the effect of artificial sweeteners on appetite and food preference is complicated. Though artificial sweetener consumption may decrease sensitivity to sweetness and increase sugar cravings for some, it appears that the exact opposite is true for others. At this point, it is unlikely that artificial sweetener intake directly increases appetite or energy intake in healthy humans and one’s behavioral response (i.e. higher or lower appetite, more or less cravings, etc.) seems to be dependent on the context and the individual.

To be continued…

I had intended to cover artificial sweeteners in one post, but my research efforts quickly turned into a meta-analysis-esque project. For an analysis of the next 3 accusations against artificial sweetener intake (cause diabetes, disrupt gut bacteria, cause cancer), plus my overall recommendation and a breakdown of my personal consumption, tune in in two weeks for Artificial Sweeteners – A Free Lunch, or an Obesogenic Carcinogen? What 80+ Studies Say (part 2). In the meantime, (and SPOILER ALERT) – I don’t think you have much to worry about, enjoy your diet soda and stevia packets in peace.


Sources

  1. https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/the-pursuit-of-sweet
  2. https://www.newsweek.com/artificial-sweeteners-weight-gain-type-2-diabetes-1478137
  3. https://www.menshealth.com/weight-loss/a19544903/artificial-sweetener-and-weight-gain/
  4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18535548/
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29159583/
  6. https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/32/4/688
  7. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jgs.13376
  8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24741154/
  9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3714671/
  10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19056571/
  11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12324283/
  12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2650084/
  13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20429009/
  14. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-3010.2006.00564.x
  15. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4786736/
  16. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24862170/
  17. https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article-abstract/51/6/963/4695307
  18. https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/76/4/721/4677434
  19. https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/65/2/409/4655348
  20. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-3010.2006.00564.x
  21. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2008866/
  22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22998340/
  23. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-3010.2006.00564.x
  24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3632875/
  25. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22205311/
  26. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892765/
  27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9023599/
  28. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2359769/
  29. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/07/160712130107.htm
  30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17712114/
  31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896338/#B28
  32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20060008/
  33. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10336168/
  34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18298259/
  35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21255472/
  36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900484/
  37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2008866/
  38. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32125421/
  39. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2892765/
  40. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15581664/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *